I Used 10 AI Tools and Shared Real Use Cases They're Good At

A comprehensive comparison of the best AI tools based on real-world usage, strengths, weaknesses, and user feedback

Created by Shailesh • beginnersblog.org
(OpenAI)
Best For
  • Everyday personal assistance: Memory feature remembers preferences, travel plans, context
  • Marketing and creative content: Best text rendering in images via DALL-E integration
  • Deep research reports: Generates detailed reports (36+ pages) with actionable recommendations
  • Voice conversations: Most natural voice flow and personality
  • Photo analysis: Analyzes objects, transcribes handwritten notes, diagnoses plants
Not Ideal For
  • Complex coding projects: Creates "basic clones" lacking features
  • Matching your writing style: Edits feel "too verbose and sterile"
  • When you need citations: Use Perplexity for source verification
I use it to find my hidden talents and blind spots. Try: "Tell me something unique you notice about me, but I haven't realized about myself yet."
Taking a pic of my handwritten scribbled notes from meetings and having it transcribe and summarize—game changer.
(Anthropic)
Best For
  • Complex coding and full applications: Built "gorgeous Tetris game", playable Mario Level 1
  • Matching your writing style: "Captures my writing style better than any other model"
  • Long document analysis: 200K token context window for entire codebases or research papers
  • Research synthesis: Produces reports that "synthesize insights" with 427+ sources
  • Artifacts feature: Real-time code visualization with simultaneous execution
  • Adding type hints and documentation to untyped Python code
Not Ideal For
  • High-volume usage: Rate limits are #1 complaint
  • Memory across sessions: Doesn't remember previous conversations
  • Image generation: Cannot generate images
With ChatGPT I usually have to tweak and critique the code to fit my project. Not so with Claude.
Treat Claude as a senior developer who explains the 'why' behind the code. Ask for reasoning, not just solutions.
Best For
  • Research with citations: Every answer includes clickable source references
  • Current events and real-time info: Processes 780M+ monthly queries with live web crawling
  • Academic research: Focus mode narrows searches to academic papers, videos, or Reddit
  • Price comparisons: Compare product prices across multiple platforms instantly
  • Advanced search operators: Use 'site:', 'before:', 'after:', and 'filetype:'
Not Ideal For
  • Creative writing: Built for research, not content generation
  • Coding: Use Claude or GitHub Copilot instead
  • Synthesis and analysis: Use ChatGPT for interpreting verified information
Saves hours of traditional Googling. It's like a fact-first, Google-enhanced research buddy with superpowers.
Pro's $20 worth it...saved my team $5K in consultant fees for market research.
Best For
  • Massive document processing: 1M+ token context window (up to 2M in preview)
  • Google Workspace integration: Seamlessly works with Gmail, Docs, Drive
  • Cost-effective AI development: Gemini Flash is cheaper than Claude Sonnet
  • Turning documents into interactive experiences: Create games from PDFs
  • Real-time visual analysis: Live camera mode for debugging while coding
Not Ideal For
  • Creative writing: Edits feel "too verbose and sterile"
  • Top-tier coding: Makes "solid games that aren't as visually polished as Claude"
  • Consistent writing voice: Struggles to maintain tone across long projects
I successfully processed my entire 140-page book when other tools couldn't handle it.
Default to Pro model for complex tasks, only use Flash when you need answers ASAP.
(V3 & R1)
Best For
  • Mathematical reasoning (R1): 97.3% on MATH-500 benchmark with transparent step-by-step thinking
  • Cost-effective AI deployment: 10-30x cheaper than comparable OpenAI models
  • General-purpose tasks (V3): Content creation, chatbots, knowledge queries
  • Self-hosting and privacy: Open-source, run locally without cloud dependency
  • Complex coding logic: R1 tailored for logic-intensive benchmarks like Codeforces (96.3% percentile)
Not Ideal For
  • China-sensitive topics: Heavy censorship on political content
  • Data privacy concerns: Chinese company with enterprise compliance concerns
  • Creative flair: "Provides functional responses but lacks code organization"
  • Quick answers (R1): R1 is much slower than V3—thinking process can take several minutes
Start with V3 for general tasks and escalate to R1 when a problem demands deeper, more rigorous logical analysis.
Near GPT-4 quality at 5-10% of the cost.
Best For
  • Real-time code completion: Context-aware suggestions while you type
  • Boilerplate and repetitive code: Eliminates tedious coding for loops and standard functions
  • Unit test generation: Generates tests for valid inputs, edge cases, and invalid inputs
  • Learning patterns and best practices from code suggestions
  • IDE integration: Native support in VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Neovim
Not Ideal For
  • Complex explanations: "Copilot is great for small snippets. I use ChatGPT more for understanding concepts"
  • Security-critical code: Always review suggestions for insecure patterns
  • Novel algorithms: Better for common patterns than creative solutions
Use Copilot for small snippets ("add a font-awesome icon to this button"), ChatGPT for bigger logic questions.
It's like having a very knowledgeable coding partner who speeds up development and introduces you to new patterns.
Best For
  • Artistic and stylized images: "Level of photorealism is mind-bending"
  • Photorealism: V7 captures fine nuances with great accuracy—appears almost lifelike
  • Fashion and portraiture: Exceptional for high-fashion shoots with incredible consistency
  • Creative variations: Generates 4 distinct styles from the same prompt
  • Moodboards: Upload reference images to create custom style profiles
Not Ideal For
  • Text in images: DALL-E handles typography better
  • Precise prompt following: Sometimes interprets prompts creatively rather than literally
  • Beginners: Requires learning prompting techniques with Discord interface learning curve
  • Free usage: No free tier. Starts at $10/month
Midjourney is for artistic quality. DALL-E is for ease of use and text accuracy. Most professionals use both.
Cut my concept art creation time in half.
Best For
  • Precision and text accuracy: Handles typography and text in images better than competitors
  • Ease of use: Seamless integration with ChatGPT for easy refinement
  • Refining through conversation: Ability to iterate and improve images through dialogue
Not Ideal For
  • Photorealism: "Still has that AI sheen on skin." Midjourney edges ahead
  • Batch variations: Midjourney generates 4 variations at once; DALL-E gives one
The ease of refining through ChatGPT is a game-changer.
DALL-E for precision and text, Midjourney for aesthetics. Use both.
(xAI)
Best For
  • Real-time X/Twitter Summarizes trending topics and analyzes conversations
  • Social sentiment analysis: Tuned for decoding public opinion from live social media
  • Creative/edgy content: "More chaotic and creative. Opinionated, spicy"
  • Less filtered responses: Designed with "a rebellious streak" to answer avoided questions
  • DeepSearch mode: Powerful for research tasks with Think mode for complex reasoning
Not Ideal For
  • Professional/formal work: Humor can interfere with clarity
  • Serious research: Can hallucinate with "factual accuracy drift" in extended conversations
  • Work outside X ecosystem: Heavily tied to X platform requiring X Premium subscription
Grok is bolder, more tuned to X's culture. ChatGPT is calmer, more balanced. It's a stylistic difference.
(Google)
Best For
  • Document-based research: Upload PDFs, YouTube videos, Google Docs for source-based answers
  • Audio Overviews: Transforms documents into podcast-style AI discussions
  • Literature reviews: Upload multiple papers to compare findings and highlight consensus
  • Study guides and flashcards: Creates learning materials from your own notes and sources
  • Cross-source analysis: Finds connections across multiple documents humans might miss
Not Ideal For
  • Real-time web information: Only works with sources you upload
  • Direct content generation: Designed for analysis, not creating original content
  • Replacing your note-taking app: Use alongside Notion, Obsidian, etc.—not instead
Got in a 7-minute workout while listening to a custom podcast about the Federal Reserve's Beige Book.
It's like having a writing coach who can analyze your entire story in seconds.